Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
While recent year’s research has concentrated on the Roman military equipment from the south Scandinavian weapon deposits, the material from other contexts has been more or less neglected. Focusing on the grave finds, a number of intriguing aspects emerge as both similarities and differences between the material of the different find groups can be identified. The differences include for instance the time of deposition as the grave finds contain Roman weapons from the early 1st century AD while most of the Roman material from the weapon deposits belong to the 3rd century AD. Apart from the Roman material itself, the grave finds also comprise imitations of e.g. Roman gladii and evidence of reuse and transformation of Roman produced militaria. This paper concentrates on the Roman material from the two first centuries AD in Danish grave finds and focus on the interaction between Roman and Germanic weapon trends and fashions and their impact on the military equipment itself.
The excavation of the Illerup ’A’ war-booty offering and the subsequent publication of the finds, have yielded new insights into Late Roman military organisation. But only few studies have so far tried to utilise these insights to (re-)study other types of source material that can cast new light upon how Late Roman period armies were organised and recruited. The present paper has dealt with weapon graves from SE Norway. Altogether, some 150 grave fi nds and stray finds with weapons that can be dated to C1-C3 are known from this rather extensive area. Taken as a whole, graves with one weapon type comprise 41 % of the total number of graves. Graves with two weapon types comprise 27 %, and graves with three comprise 32 %. Thus, it seems that graves with a ’full’ set of weapons is over- represented in SE Norway vis-à-vis Denmark. 12 % of the weapon graves can be attributed to Ilkjær’s level 2, against 88 % in level 3. For Illerup the comparable ratios would be 9 % and 89 %, respectively. Thus, there is a great degree of correspondence between the SE Norwegian weapon graves and the Illerup find. In SE Norway, graves associated with level 2 consist of two combinations: a full weapon set either 1) with or 2) without spur(s). Level 3 has three combinations: 1) a singular lance or javelin (and sometimes including a shield), 2) sword, lance, and javelin (and sometimes including a shield), and 3) lance and javelin (and sometimes including a shield). Only one aspect of the SE Norwegian material associated with level 3 seems to diverge from the Illerup pattern, namely the dominance of finds with only one weapon type, either a lance or a javelin. Most of the weapon graves in the present study are from the ’Opplandene’ area, i.e. from the districts centred at the great lakes of Eastern Norway, Randsfjorden, Tyrifjorden, and Mjøsa. The dominance of weapon graves in this region has been dicussed within Norwegian archaeology since the 1920s, with researchers at times arguing for a military interpretion, and at times for a social or economic one. In the ’Opplandene’, there is a tendency for graves with swords, either belonging to level 2 or level 3, to form large, marked clusters. There is one such cluster in each of the old ’folkland’ Ringerike, Hadeland, and Toten. Graves with lance and/or javelin (and sometimes shield) as the only weapon(s) also occur in more peripheral areas, and thus have a much more widespread distribution than the sword graves. In the Illerup fi nd, swords are associated with the upper and middle level of the military hierarchy, as well as with a minority within the lower level. In Late Roman burials in ’Opplandene’ the numerical distribution of weapon types is similar to the one from Illerup. But topographically speaking there seem to be clear differences between weapon graves with or without swords, as graves with swords are found first and foremost in clusters which also contain level 2 graves, i.e. graves associated with the middle level of the Illerup hierarchy. There is only one kind of militaryorganisation which seem to fit this pattern: aristocratic retinues. The distribution of weapon graves in the ’Opplandene’ is a topographical expression of the difference between the sword-possessing aristocracy and their followers on the one hand, and ’ordinary’ warriors on the other. The members of the retinue were based on the chieftain’s hall. The reason for the clustering of weapon graves in smaller districts, i.e. not solely on the farm containing the chieftain’s hall, could be that the comites were granted farms that were part of the chieftain’s estate for their maintenance. The spear and/or javelin carrying foot-soldiers were probably recruited from the large and diverse group of free men, including independent farmers, loyal to the chief. Big Late Roman armies like the one defeated at Illerup were probably made up of several chieftains’ retinues, with each level 1 warrior commanding a retinue including both level 2 and level 3 men. 10 to 12 clusters of the same kind as the 3 to 5 found in the ’Opplandene’ would be enough to gather an army of a thousand men. It cannot be a coincidence that there is one cluster of weapon graves with swords in each of the old landscapes of Ringerike, Hadeland, Hedemarken and Toten, i.e. all of the central districts in the ’Opplandene’. One can hardly avoid the conclusion that these ’folklands’ were in existence already by the 3rd century AD, at least as distinct social and military hierarchies.
The present paper deals with a minority of burials in Roman (B-C) and Migration period (D) Norway, namely the ones containing weapons. Its aim is two-folded: 1) to present an overview of this material to non-Norwegian colleagues, and 2) to discuss the significance of the weapon burial rite in its Scandinavian and North European context. Regarding the first, I intend to focus on the chronology, regional distribution and typology of burials with weapons. As for the latter, the emphasis will be on weapon graves as evidence both of the militarisation of barbarian society in general and more specific of warlike relations between the Roman Empire and the northern Germans, particularly the question of Scandinavian auxiliaries in the Roman army.
Die Bewaffnung der Germanen und ihrer Nachbarn in den letzten Jahrhunderten vor Christi Geburt
The introduction of the weapon burial rite in Southern Scandinavia during the Late Pre-Roman Iron Age2002 •
The paper revises the chronology of the weapon burials in Scandinavia in the light of the new Pre-Roman Iron Age chronology of Jutland suggested by the author in 1995 (see Praehistorische Zeitschrift vol. 71.2, 1996, pp. 217-243). This enables the author to split up the material into three chronological "waves" with different diagnostic types spreading from different centres. The meaning of the weapon burial rite is discussed and it is demonstrated that there is no direct link between weapons and other wealth indicating goods in the graves, neither between the equipment and the possible role the person played in actual warfare. The choice of equipment in the grave is a strictly ideological expression.
Roman militaria in Germanic Context. Largest collection of Roman produced militaria north of Limes. Mostly 2nd-3rd century AD
Danish Journal of Archaeology
A Rich weapon burial from the Late Roman Iron Age at Veldbæk, Denmark- comments on the distribution of power in Southern Jutland2022 •
During two campaigns in 1997 and 1999, archaeologists from Esbjerg Museum excavated a spectacular Late Roman Iron Age weapon burial at Veldbaek in Esbjerg, Denmark. In addition to full weaponry, the deceased was buried with magnificent grave goods such as gilded fittings for a military belt, gaming pieces, a gold finger ring, a silver animal fibula, a red carnelian intaglio, and a copper-alloy-clad wooden bucket. The assemblage dates the grave to the transition between periods C1b and C2 of the Late Roman Iron Age, which is to say ca. AD 250 or shortly thereafter. The grave is a crucial new piece in the puzzle to understand how power was distributed in southern Jutland during the Late Roman Iron Age.
The paper explores the cultural components of Late Roman military equipment through the examination of specific categories: waist belts, helmets, shields and weaponry. Hellenistic, Roman, Iron Age European, Mesopotamian-Iranian and Asiatic steppe nomad elements all played a part. The conclusion is that the whole history of Roman military equipment involved cultural inclusivity, and specifically that Late Roman equipment development was not some new form of ‘degeneration’ or ‘barbarization’, but a positive acculturation.
Proceedings from the 18th RoMEC conference in 2013 in Copenhagen
2020 •
Decades of excavations on the Hunerberg at Nijmegen have yielded an uncountable number of features and finds, including over 1,000 items of military equipment and horse gear. These items can be attributed to an Augustan military base and to a Flavio-Trajanic legionary fortress (castra) and its extramural civil settlement (canabae legionis). This book provides a catalogue as well as a detailed analysis of this fascinating assemblage. What makes this study stand out is that it discusses finds from a legionary fortress along with its civil settlement. Only rarely are both settlements excavated to a degree that a comparison between the two is possible, which makes this assemblage an ideal candidate for the study of these two communities and of the way in which they interacted. Some aspects addressed in this volume are the function and chronology of the objects, production and recycling of military equipment and the question whether military equipment and horse gear can provide evidence for the presence of auxiliary infantry or cavalry. Furthermore, particular attention is paid to the distribution and the context of the various classes of finds. Several approaches are explored to investigate how objects were deposited and to what extent their distribution has been influenced by post-depositional processes such as erosion or site disturbance, and by differing excavation methods.
Cara Mengobati Efek Samping Suntik Minyak Urang Aring Pada Penis Dijamin Ampuh Rekomendasi Dokter
Cara Mengobati Efek Samping Suntik Minyak Urang Aring Pada Penis Dijamin Ampuh Rekomendasi Dokter2020 •
Proceedings of 11th International Congress of IUSSI, Bangalore, India
THE DETERMINANTS OF DOMINANCE IN A PRIMITIVELY EUSOCIAL WASP1990 •
Neurobiology of Aging
Genome-wide analysis of genetic correlation in Dementia with Lewy Bodies, Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases2015 •
Journal of Mechanics Engineering and Automation
Advanced Identification Methods for Industrial Processes with Big Time Delays2012 •
2014 •
Travel medicine and infectious disease
Severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the intensive care unit: A 6-year experience in Milano, ItalyThe Fifth Richard Tapia Celebration of Diversity in Computing Conference on Intellect, Initiatives, Insight, and Innovations - TAPIA '09
A knowledge-based database system for visual rating of fMRI activation patterns for brain language networks2009 •
2016 •
Bulletin of the American Physical Society
Electron acceleration with advanced injection methods at the ASTRA laser2015 •
Journal of Small Business Management
Alliances and Survival of New Biopharmaceutical Ventures in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis2017 •
Perspectivas En Nutricion Humana
Preferencia y aceptabilidad de la variedad de arroz IACuba 30 con alto contenido de hierro y zinc por mujeres gestantes en Cuba2020 •
2018 •
2018 •
BMC Biotechnology
Efficient production of chimeric Human papillomavirus 16 L1 protein bearing the M2e influenza epitope in Nicotiana benthamiana plants2011 •
2013 •
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Assessment of river water quality using an integrated physicochemical, biological and ecotoxicological approach2014 •